Talk to anyone who’s administered a scholarship program and you’ll hear about the folders.
Staff is the one stitching it together.
By Ion Despoiu. Originally posted on LinkedIn, .
Every applicant has one. Sometimes on a shared drive. Sometimes on a desktop. Sometimes nested three levels deep in someone’s email.
Inside each folder, staff has manually assembled the pieces.
- The transcript that came in as a PDF attachment from the registrar.
- The recommendation letter the professor emailed three weeks after the deadline.
- The personal statement from the applicant.
- The financial documentation.
- Whatever else the program requires.
Each document arrives separately. From a different sender. Through a different channel. At a different time.
Staff is the one stitching it together. Renaming files so they match the folder structure. Cross-checking the spreadsheet that tracks who’s still missing what. Sending reminder emails to professors who forgot. Following up with the applicant to confirm the right recommender was contacted.
By the time the review committee opens the file, the folder is complete. Reviewers don’t see the work it took to assemble it. They just see an applicant.
That work is staff heroics. The kind that’s so normalized in scholarship administration that nobody questions whether it should be the staff’s job in the first place.
It shouldn’t be.
The applicant should be able to share a link for every required document. Letter of recommendation. Transcript. Whatever else. Each one arrives in the right place automatically. Reviewers see a complete file. Staff sees a status board, not an inbox.
This is how a scholarship program on New Empact Work works. The folders are gone. So is the spreadsheet that tracked them. So are the reminder emails staff used to send.
What’s left is the scholarship program staff actually wanted to run, before email and shared drives became the job.